ECO-PSYCHO-SUNNAH: BRIDGING CLASSICAL HADITH COMMENTARY AND CONTEMPORARY ECOPSYCHOLOGY IN THE READING OF HUMAN–NATURE RELATIONS

  • Akbar . Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Indonesia
Keywords: Connectedness to nature; Eco-Psycho-Sunnah; ecological ḥadīṡ; ecopsychology; ḥadīṡ commentary; maqāṣid al-ḥadīṡ

Abstract

The contemporary ecological crisis is increasingly understood not merely as physical degradation but as a crisis of relation and meaning with measurable psychological consequences. Scholarship on ecological ḥadīṡ has largely remained within juridical-normative or thematic-ethical registers, whereas ecopsychology has developed within a predominantly secular horizon; the two rarely meet. This article proposes and applies an integrative framework, termed Eco-Psycho-Sunnah, which reads the inner objective (al-maqṣid al-nafsī) embedded in classical ḥadīṡ commentary alongside contemporary ecopsychological constructs. Employing a qualitative library-based design and a three-step reading procedure of takhrīj, commentarial reading (qirā’ah sharḥiyyah), and complementary juxtaposition (muqābalah takāmuliyyah), the study analyses six ṣaḥīḥ ecological hadiths across four functional clusters, namely regenerative, conservational, protective, and relational. The results show that classical commentaries, although framed juridically, already encode orientations toward meaning, self-regulation, tranquillity, and compassion that converge with the constructs of meaning in life, self-regulation, restorative experience, and connectedness to nature. The study argues that ecopsychology is not an alien theory imposed upon the Sunnah but a contemporary vocabulary for an inner objective already latent within the commentarial tradition.

References

Abū Dāwud, Sulaimān bin Asy`aṡ. (2009). Sunan Abī Dāwud (Syuʿaib al-Arnaūṭ, Ed.). Dār al-Risālah al-`Ālamiyah.
Al-Bassām, ‘Abdullāh. (n.d.). Taysīr al-‘Allām Sharḥ ‘Umdat al-Aḥkām. Dār al-Maymān.
Al-Bukhārī, Muhammad bin Ismā`īl. (1993). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Muṣṭafā Dīb al-Bigā, Ed.). Dār Ibn Kaṡīr.
Al-Naysābūrī, M. bin al-Ḥajjāj. (1955). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyyah.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2001). Ri‘āyat al-Bī’ah fī Sharī‘at al-Islām. Dār al-Shurūq.
Albrecht, G., Sartore, G.-M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The Distress Caused by Environmental Change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(1_suppl), S95–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288
Al‐Damkhi, A. M. (2008). Environmental ethics in Islam: Principles, violations, and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230701859724
Al-Nawawī, Y. bin S. (1392). Al-Minhāj Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Dar Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-‘Arabī.
Arbuckle, M. B., & Konisky, D. M. (2015). The Role of Religion in Environmental Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1244–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12213
Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567–8572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510459112
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2
Curll, S. L., Stanley, S. K., Brown, P. M., & O’Brien, L. V. (2022). Nature connectedness in the climate change context: Implications for climate action and mental health. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 8(4), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000329
Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., & Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
Gada, M. Y. (2014). Environmental Ethics in Islam: Principles and Perspectives. World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 4(4), 130–138.
Ibn `Āsyūr, M. Ṭ. (1984). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Al-Dār al-Tunisiyah li al-Nasyr.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, A. ibn ʿAlī. (1959). Fatḥ al-Bārī bi-Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (M. F. `Abd al-Bāqī & M. al-Dīn Al-Khaṭīb, Eds.). Dār al-Maʿrifah.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.
Mangunjaya, F. M. (2011). Developing Environmental Awareness and Conservation Through Islamic Teaching. Journal of Islamic Studies, 22(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etq067
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
Muttaqin, Z. (2019). The Nature of Excessive Behavior (Isrāf) in the Islamic Economic Framework. Journal of Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 49–57.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature (Issue 167). Oxford University Press.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection with Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740.
Özdemir, I. (2008). The Ethical Dimension of Human Attitude Towards Nature: A Muslim Perspective. Insan Publications.
Parker, L. (2017). Religious Environmental Education? The New School Curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249–1272.
Pihkala, P. (2020). Anxiety and the Ecological Crisis: An Analysis of Eco-Anxiety and Climate Anxiety. Sustainability, 12(19), 7836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197836
Preston, J. L., & Shin, F. (2022). Opposing effects of Spirituality and Religious Fundamentalism on environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101772
Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental Behavior in Egypt: Is there a Role for Islamic Environmental Ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0010-9
Saniotis, A. (2012). Muslims and ecology: Fostering Islamic environmental ethics. Contemporary Islam, 6(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-011-0173-8
Skalski, S. B., Loichen, T., Toussaint, L. L., Uram, P., Kwiatkowska, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2022). Relationships between Spirituality, Religious Fundamentalism and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013242
Steger, M. F., & Frazier, P. (2005). Meaning in Life: One Link in the Chain from Religiousness to Well-Being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 574–582.
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.
Tongeren, R. D., DeWall, C. N., Green, J. D., Cairo, A. H., Davis, D. E., & Hook, J. N. (2018). Self-Regulation Facilitates Meaning in Life. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 95–106.
Twohig-Bennett, C., & Jones, A. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.
Wasman, W., Mesraini, M., & Suwendi, S. (2023). A Critical Approach to Prophetic Traditions: Contextual Criticism in Understanding Hadith. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.1-17
Wijaya, A., & Muzammil, S. (2021). Maqāṣidi Tafsir: Uncovering and Presenting Maqāṣid Ilāhī-Qur’anī in a Contemporary Context. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 59(2), 449–478. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.449-478
Zakiyah, E. (2022). Maudhui’s Tafsir Method in the Qur’an and Hadith on Maqasid Syariah for Economic Welfare in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy, 5(4), 235. https://doi.org/10.21111/jiep.v5i4.8289
Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
., A. (2024). ECO-PSYCHO-SUNNAH: BRIDGING CLASSICAL HADITH COMMENTARY AND CONTEMPORARY ECOPSYCHOLOGY IN THE READING OF HUMAN–NATURE RELATIONS. Al-Munir: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 6(2), 377 - 395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/al-munir.v6i2.2381